invent a war and having already lost
A demonstration of what I wrote yesterday , now you are telling the Press that Obama has never said things against blogs and bloggers, but they are clearly in the minds of many journalists in the psychological state of siege and distracted removal what are the greatest sources of news that they were not: the same for which they write. In the brief interview to two newspapers of Toledo and Pittsburgh - which had linked yesterday - Obama just says these things.
"journalistic integrity, you know, fact-based reporting, serious investigative reporting, how to retain Those All These different ethics in new media and how to make sure That it's paid for, is really a challenge”
“I am concerned that if the direction of the news is all blogosphere, all opinions, with no serious fact-checking, no serious attempts to put stories in context, that what you will end up getting is people shouting at each other across the void but not a lot of mutual understanding”
“What I hope is that people start understanding if you’re getting your newspaper over the Internet, that’s not free and there’s got to be a way to find a business model that supports that.”
Attenzione: che Obama abbia una diffidenza rispetto all’affidabilità delle discussioni che circolano in rete l’aveva già detto lui stesso in un’intervista the New York Times in March, but nothing more than that. And as you see in these passages there are only two of Obama's views on the net: you lose the "serious fact-checking" (long since lost in the editorial offices of Italian newspapers) and that we must find a business model for online information . I do not discuss these views, even if there would be, are understandable and justified, although general, very concise and oblivious of the fact that the same flaws are in the mainstream media, which indeed they have taught and legitimate.
But the press today instead headline "Obama says to just blogger" and a mountain of articles put in their mouths things that the President never said. The funny thing is disappointing is that puts the "blog", "bloggers" and "blogosphere" as the subject of each preposition, where Obama was once limited to use the word blogosphere. No one wants to defend the blog at all costs ("blogs" do not exist and are a thousand good and bad things, like books, newspapers, movies, etc.) but that the major Italian newspapers go in search of legitimacy by claiming that the Their great enemy is the blog and pull for a jacket that until recently claimed to have been elected thanks to the network and blog, laugh at best. Not to mention the question of fact-checking here What would he say Obama according to the press today.
more control over news circulating on the Internet
what they want to avoid is the risk that the decline of newspapers on paper led to the development of a blogosphere 'no control' over what is written.
Obama admits to being impressed by the decision of the "Rocky Mountain News" of Denver and the "Seattle Post-Intelligencer" to stop moving completely to online publications on paper, as well as the huge problems faced by newspapers emblazoned as the "Chicago Tribune, the Los Angeles Times and the New York Times. (this writes the original article, not Obama, who has just "Noted the trend")
On the other hand, is the president of the Web much more explicit in to make it clear he wants to intervene.
"I am very concerned about the type of information circulating in the blogosphere - he explains - where you will find all sorts of information and ideas without being verified , with the result of bringing shouting at each other, making it more difficult mutual understanding 'Obama has zero shot against the blogosphere (bùm!)
The fact is that President American has had enough of the blog "just full of opinions, without checking the facts, run by people who cry out against each other without a minimum of mutual understanding"
Seeing the horizon a new world where even the political will be considered and addressed by an uncontrolled blogosphere, Obama has decided to invest in the good old paper journalism
Most "bloggers" is not interested in truth, verification of information reported online, respect the opinions of others. E 'instead animated by an ideological furor in which prevail, as Obama says, the approximations and lack of responsibility, seasoned with gusts of insults against anyone who disagrees.
But the most blatantly false written today in La Stampa, and this is denied by itself.
but for now it is certain that the attack on the journalism professionals failed
0 comments:
Post a Comment